Fujimoto’s Fall from Grace
An April 2024 court ruling that found Fujimoto guilty of breaching his fiduciary duties is the root of his current troubles. The drawn-out lawsuit, which started in August 2019, determined he pushed the transfer of $43.5 million to an external source without reasonable justification and adherence to internal decision-making protocols.
Fujimoto has since stepped down as Universal Entertainment’s President and CEO. The company has stated it will likely pursue compensation equivalent to the total amount.
“It is appropriate to dismiss Mr. Jun Fujimoto from his position as director of the company in order to ensure thorough compliance and maintain sound governance of the company,” stated Universal’s representatives. The move is meant to reinforce the company’s dedication to good governance, which has been a messy affair in recent years.
A Fresh Start with a Familiar Face
The entry of Tomohiro Okada into Universal Entertainment leadership is a significant moment for the corporation. He currently serves as Okada Holding’s Director and has a 53.27% controlling stake.
While Kazuo and Tomohiro are father and son, there is a deep rift between them. In 2017, Tomohiro ousted Kazuo from the Okada Manila board. The rift widened when Kazuo insighted a hostile takeover of the same company in 2022. A court then ruled his proper removal as CEO, Chairperson, Director, and shareholder of Tiger Resort, Leisure, and Entertainment, the operation company of the Okada Manila Casino Resort.
Universal Entertainment defended Tomohiro’s proposed appointment, stating it would strengthen the corporation’s business ventures in Japan and internationally.
A Pivotal Moment for Universal Entertainment
The leadership changes at Universal Entertainment are likely inspired by the company’s efforts to stabilize after several legal battles and internal strife in recent years. Onboarding Tomohiro signals its shift towards a leadership structure that resolves past conflicts and opens opportunities for future growth. Also, Fujimoto’s dismissal indicates a determination to reinforce proper leadership and transparency, which has marred the company’s history.